“An informant is an individual who voluntarily provides information to law enforcement or other authorities about community activities or persons without the consent of those being discussed. This role is often contentious, especially when the information shared could have significant repercussions on the individuals involved or when it’s used to support law enforcement actions in non-violent or politically sensitive situations.”

Lydia Ponce Informant Activities Confirmed
In Venice—a community known for its vibrant activism and unique community spirit—a disturbing pattern has emerged where the weaponization of identity politics and personal agendas threaten to undermine authentic Brown & Black liberation initiatives. At the time of these receipts, Mike Bravo, Venice’s only officially sanctioned Chicano-Indigenous political representative, was the target of character assassination by Lydia Ponce and others claiming to usurp the non-profit “Save Venice,” which Bravo runs.

Past Rumors of Lydia Ponce’s Law Enforcement Relationships
Recent developments have confirmed what many in Los Angeles activist circles have speculated for some time: Lydia Ponce has consistently been working with law enforcement in ways that violate the rules of engagement for those espousing Indigenous and Abolitionist values.
As of April 2023, documented evidence shows that Lydia has actively provided unnecessary information to the LAPD. Aside from weaponizing the settler-colonial criminal justice system, her behavior includes supplying photos and details about community members, specifically targeting Chicano activists over non-violent and disingenuous claims. Lydia Ponce’s quick reflexes to weaponize police resources against activists highlight a serious breach of community trust and contradiction for someone espousing themselves as an abolitionist and opponent of the American criminal justice system.
Zoom Meeting Evidence
More concerning are details from a Zoom meeting in which Naomi Nightingale and associates were caught on tape discussing how to dress up charges to entice the DA to take action against Mike. These discussions were not mere strategizing but deliberate attempts to misuse the legal system to silence an effective and outspoken community leader.

A Wider Trend of Undermining Mexican American Leaders
This incident is part of a notable trend in Los Angeles, where Mexican American leaders are increasingly finding themselves undermined and targeted. The “Fed tapes” scandal involving former Los Angeles City Council members highlights similar suspicious patterns of racial and political undermining, reflecting a questionable trend of challenges that Mexican-American community leaders now face.
Community Reaction and Resistance
This misuse of authority has not gone unnoticed or unchallenged. Mike Bravo, known for his dedication to racial justice and historic preservation, has faced considerable opposition from Lydia and her associates. They have repeatedly attempted to thwart community initiatives, including efforts to establish a racial justice committee on the Venice Neighborhood Council—a move that Lydia has actively obstructed alongside gentrifiers.
In a particularly bold move, Lydia’s group tried to unilaterally change Oakwood’s name, disregarding the area’s rich Mexican-American heritage. Thankfully, vigilant local activists and groups like Defend Venice, which Mike supports, were able to halt these efforts, preserving the collective voice of the Oakwood community and its Black and Brown heritage.
Legal and Social Triumphs
Despite these adversities and the weaponizing of Venice’s institutional forces, Mike Bravo and his supporters have achieved notable victories. The successful campaign to secure a Historic Designation for the First Baptist Church of Venice is a prime example of their resilience. Led by Mike, this campaign was not just about preserving a building but also about fighting to honor Venice’s cultural legacy against those who sought to commodify it.
Moreover, Mike prevailed in court against the baseless claims brought by Lydia Ponce, Naomi Nightingale, the Venice Beachhead paper, and their cohorts. The (small claims) court decisively dismissed their accusations, further vindicating Bravo and underscoring the slanderous nature of their campaign against him.
Looking Ahead
These incidents underscore a broader issue of how political dynamics can infiltrate and disrupt grassroots activism. Lydia Ponce’s confirmed activities as a police informant and her associates’ attempts to exploit and weaponize legal mechanisms against Mike Bravo reveal the extent of their willingness to undermine community unity for personal gain.
As the community moves forward, it’s more important than ever to remain vigilant and informed about the tactics employed by those who wish to divide. United in knowledge and purpose, Venice’s activists can continue to safeguard their community’s integrity and push forward their agenda for social justice and authentic abolitionist values.
FAQS
Is Lydia Ponce a police informant?
Documents show Lydia Ponce provided information to the LAPD and Los Angeles County District Attorney to pursue charges against Venice activist Mike Bravo. The records include an email from an LAPD detective scheduling Ponce to identify Bravo in a photo line-up, and a Zoom transcript of Ponce and associates strategizing an arrest.
What evidence shows Lydia Ponce worked with the LAPD?
The evidence against Lydia Ponce includes a direct email from LAPD Pacific Area Detective David Hawkins, who asked her to come to the station to identify a suspect in a photo line-up. A separate Zoom transcript records Ponce asking how to “go in alignment to the police and simultaneously take it to the DA.”
Why is Lydia Ponce called a fake abolitionist?
Lydia Ponce is called a fake abolitionist because she publicly espouses Indigenous, anti-police, and prison-abolition values while providing information to the LAPD and DA against a Chicano activist over a nonviolent dispute. The documented conduct contradicts the abolitionist principles she claims.
How did Mike Bravo obtain the documents about Lydia Ponce?
Mike Bravo obtained the documents because Lydia Ponce and her associates mailed them to him as their own evidence in a small-claims case they filed against him. Bravo retains the original copies, mail packaging, and court forms. The case was dismissed.




